A Nefarious Agenda, By Any Other Name
Yes, there is an undirected machine, operating on its own momentum. But there is also a nefarious agenda. Both things can be true at once.
In this article:
…
makes the case AGAINST a “nefarious agenda” behind all these pandemic wargame events, like SPARS, Event 201, and now Catastrophic Contagion.Instead, he says, these are simply a “mind virus” called Pandemicism, which infected our societal and institutional structures long ago, and which are now running on their own momentum.
Entire careers, institutions, and grant funding schemes were built up around eradicating smallpox in the Sixties and Seventies, and they didn’t simply go away afterwards. They acquired “institutional momentum” that couldn’t simply be turned off when the mission was over.
Add to this the era of philanthropaths1 like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and you have a machine that can’t be turned off.
These tabletop wargame exercises, like Catastrophic Contagion, are essentially fundraising and publicity events—ways of raising public awareness, and funding the careers and grants of the pandemicists who need to be fed.
(And, I would add, justifying the existence for, and lining the pockets of, the philanthropaths).
As
says: “we get the viral freak-outs that we plan for.”(Also, as
rightly points out, we also go looking in every bat cave in China for the pathogens we have grant money to find and could actually do the job we want them to do.)Essentially, according to
, the pandemicists are not nefariously “planning” these events, but they are maintaining the apparatus within which the events are likely to be brought into being, like a self-fulfilling prophecy.This is undoubtedly true. (But not the whole truth. Keep reading.)
I’ve written innumerable times about how bad stories, when adopted by a society, have bad consequences. They worm their way into our lives in subtle ways, they set up shop in our institutions, and pretty soon all our lives and actions become about making the story true.
(And about quashing the non-believers in the story.)
This is why critical thinkers perform an invaluable role in society. Their job is to call out blatant fictions, hopefully before those fictions have a chance to be “normalized” into our societal way of life.
For some stories, we’re too late. The story (or mind virus, if you want) of the “bad guys” (scary pathogens) versus “good guys” (vaccines) has been deeply rooted into the public consciousness with decades of propaganda. Which is why the non-believers, this time around, faced such a backlash. “Vaccines Wonderful” has become a beloved tale, like The Lord of the Rings, and, in the mind of the true believers, questioning it is akin to shit-talking Frodo.
So, yes, we now have an undirected, unstoppable machine called Pandemicism which runs itself on its own institutional momentum.
And we have a public which buys into the story and helps to reinforce it.
But I believe this is only part of the story.
THE AGENDA
Even if it’s true that pandemicism is at work in our institutions, it might ALSO be true that bad actors and would-be tyrants are keenly aware of it, and are using it to further their aims.
It's true there is "institutional momentum". But there is also a nefarious agenda.
Both things can be true at once.
It would be foolish of us to ignore that.
It’s like if a piece of paper saw the approach of scissors but could only see one blade, and said: “We’ll be fine. No evidence of cutting intent here.”
Obviously, we need to worry about the other blade.
Because there is an agenda at work here, and it we don’t have to infer it. They’ve told us.
The Davos Set cabalists have a vision for the way they want the world to be.
I believe they’re deluded enough to think their vision represents The Good.
But even if their agenda is well-intentioned, that does not make it less evil or less nefarious. The barest glance at history will give you a thousand examples of great evils visited upon people by those who thought they were doing God’s work.
Good intentions don’t diminish the evil. They pave the path for it.
There is a further mind virus at work here, a story, which constitutes the other blade of the scissors that are cutting us.
It goes something like…
There are important folks like us, who, owing to our positions of wealth and power, know what is best for the world. And there are the rest, the masses, the mindless herd, the useless feeders.
They are cattle which must be told what to do—corralled, chipped, medicated, sterilized, and culled—for their own good.
To this end, we shall take away their every freedom and possession, which are merely obstacles to our vision, until they are utterly dependent on us.
And then we shall run the world as it should be run, and those that remain shall see our wisdom and be compliant workers in the new Utopia.
This mind virus has just as much power, if not more, than the biosecurity/pandemicist mind virus. In fact, the former likely contains and uses the latter. The larger “people as mindless cattle in the coming Utopia” story may constitute the “larger cave” which we find ourselves backed into. (See the Principle of Interconnected Caves in this post...)
And all of society’s institutions are being broken to make it true.
I believe the Davos Set think they know what “moral behavior” is for you and I, and it looks something like obedience or happy, unquestioning compliance. (The same way we regard compliant children as “good boys and girls”.)
I believe they are deluded enough to believe they are “saving the planet”, whatever that might mean in their twisted, sociopathic minds.
And, like good sociopaths, I believe these delusions make them indifferent to the body count.
Their story, their vision of the beautiful biotech-topia, is set.
They mean to see it done.
And they see you and I, and anyone who disagrees, as the infestation that must be eliminated, or at the very least, tricked into going along.
And boy howdy have they have found a wonderful compliance tool in pandemics.
This is exactly how evil manifests.
It need not show up in plumes of red smoke with horns and fangs.
It could show up as an idea in a perfectly banal someone who then has a deluded, maniacal vision of enforcing that idea on everyone else.
“What do you think they would look like? Like mad Fuehrers with forelocks and shoe-polish mustaches, heiling all over the place? Like red devils, or demons, or the dragon that floats on its stinking reptile wings? I think most of them would look like ordinary accountants.”
—Stephen King, Apt Pupil
Evil Doesn’t Have to Be Conscious. In Fact, It Usually Isn’t.
It doesn’t matter if their plan is not “consciously evil”, whatever that means.
It doesn’t matter if they think they are superior and wise and benevolent.
It doesn’t matter if they’re not wringing their hands and cackling gleefully.
It does not matter if they honestly believe their coming utopia will be wonderful.
All that matters is that they’re motivated by some vision for humanity, which they mean to enforce on everyone, using all their available tools.
And if they’re motivated enough, they will start breaking things (and people) to make it so.
They do not see gain-of-function research as evil, since they believe it helps them create new medical products for “our own good”.
They do not see the mandating of those medical products, and of green passes and vax passports, as evil, any more than the rancher sees injecting and tagging and branding his cattle as evil.
They do not see the use of pandemic propaganda as evil, if it manipulates the cattle into being corralled more easily.
They do not see the digital panopticon surveillance machine as evil, since that allows them to observe the movement and intentions of the entire herd.
They do not see the wholesale jettisoning of rights and freedoms as evil, since these merely represent nuisance-like obstacles to their agenda. Cattle have no “right” to anything, only the privileges granted them by the rancher.
They do not see the torpedoing of the economy as evil, since it will lead to everyone begging for CBDCs or programmable currency, which will then function as the ultimate social credit control mechanism and keep everyone obedient and compliant.
They do not see the influencing of elections, and the placing of puppets who will do their bidding in positions of power as evil, since people possessing actual electoral power might not vote to be corralled.
They do not see the stifling of free speech and the silencing of dissenters as evil, since resistance and revolutions are born in such exchanges.
They do not see the buying up of land and resources, and forcing small business owners and small farmers out of business as evil, since those owners and farmers represent an obstacle to their vision of a centrally-managed biosphere.
They do not see forced sterilization and the attack on reproductive rates as an evil, since this helps lower the herd to a manageable size.
Some are even honest enough to admit that they don’t need a herd at all:
So, let’s say there is a new “catastrophic contagion” along with a bunch of new, spiffy mitigation measures and lockdowns.
Yes, part of it might be the pandemicist machine operating on its own. But these measures will also undoubtedly finish off an already ailing economy, which fits nicely with the plans of the Davos Set, since then they can have everyone clamoring to them for rescue.
In other words, a nice merger of pandemicist and PLANdemicist.
Is some of it “institutional momentum”? Undoubtedly.
Is some of it diabolical agenda? Absolutely.
Two blades of a scissor.
Here’s their problem: they need us to quietly submit to the cutting.
They need most humans to believe they are being guided by wise, intelligent, benevolent masters. They need us to see it as the good--not the brutal, insanely, monstrously evil plan that it is.
If the average person begins to understand what is really going on here—and what they are being asked to give up, and for whose benefit—the cabalist’s plans are doomed.
So, our only question is: will we go along with it compliantly, like cattle into a chute?
Feels like you read my mind then supplemented those thoughts with a number of brilliant angles I hadn't thought of, and then wrote it in a clear, compelling, and entertaining way. 10,000 points. Great work. 💙
I don't think what has transpired was a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The first priority of any organization is to see to the viability and permanence of the organization. Corporate structures allow for permanence beyond human lifetimes, and cover for values that humans could never exercise due to social and legal repercussions. Which is why I believe there should be execution for organizations that commit murder or genocide. This did not happen after WWII, the companies that profited from the killing and slave labor in the camps were allowed to keep operating. Nuremberg 2.0 needs to address the organizations, foundations, and corporations.
I totally get the vast majority of people inside these programs do not want to bear any responsibility for going along with a program they were hired into, may not have any actually institutional power, so I think we can hold the guns for the big targets. They have been involved for decades in coaxing and molding these programs, and that they view the peons as cattle is not an excuse for holding the view or the behavior it engenders. It says nothing about us, but much about them.
There was not merely institutional momentum, there were conspirators inside the institutions. Fauci made at least one ad for WEF; he was appointed the 'biowarfare czar' by Cheney. He has used official public monies for research for political purposes, and to silence scientists.; Collins did as well. Gates has been involved at planning levels in both public and private institutions, and has used both his private funds and his foundation, to affect policy and direction at the national and international level, and has done so for decades. "Unconscious evil" that has committed actual crimes, including abrogating treaty obligations on treatment of subjects in medical experiments, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the laws.