Dec 17, 2022·edited Dec 17, 2022Liked by James Edward Taylor
Feels like you read my mind then supplemented those thoughts with a number of brilliant angles I hadn't thought of, and then wrote it in a clear, compelling, and entertaining way. 10,000 points. Great work. 💙
I don't think what has transpired was a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The first priority of any organization is to see to the viability and permanence of the organization. Corporate structures allow for permanence beyond human lifetimes, and cover for values that humans could never exercise due to social and legal repercussions. Which is why I believe there should be execution for organizations that commit murder or genocide. This did not happen after WWII, the companies that profited from the killing and slave labor in the camps were allowed to keep operating. Nuremberg 2.0 needs to address the organizations, foundations, and corporations.
I totally get the vast majority of people inside these programs do not want to bear any responsibility for going along with a program they were hired into, may not have any actually institutional power, so I think we can hold the guns for the big targets. They have been involved for decades in coaxing and molding these programs, and that they view the peons as cattle is not an excuse for holding the view or the behavior it engenders. It says nothing about us, but much about them.
There was not merely institutional momentum, there were conspirators inside the institutions. Fauci made at least one ad for WEF; he was appointed the 'biowarfare czar' by Cheney. He has used official public monies for research for political purposes, and to silence scientists.; Collins did as well. Gates has been involved at planning levels in both public and private institutions, and has used both his private funds and his foundation, to affect policy and direction at the national and international level, and has done so for decades. "Unconscious evil" that has committed actual crimes, including abrogating treaty obligations on treatment of subjects in medical experiments, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the laws.
Mind virus? For there to be a thing that attacks, you need a thing that can be attacked. Certainly something’s happening, but the interpretation depends on the lens in which you view it. Is biology life itself, or what life looks like seen from your point of view?
Is what you see reality, or the image of what you think reality is? Is the image the thing itself?
On the playground called viruses are real, which is a point of view, you need something that can be attacked by them to validate that they are what they are.
Playing at answering the good and evil questions without awareness of the image as an image, and that there is no thing, but only perception, is just an attempt to be right about something.
Is something attempting to effect your perception? Of course there is. Are you responsible for that? Is there a part you play in accepting influence? Aren’t you attempting to influence the views of others? Of course you are.
Maybe what life is, isn’t a billion separate pixels, each a discrete self with a valid point of view. Maybe each pixel is ultimately responsible for the view it upholds and will be in distress or harmony according to its choice.
Bill Gates with all his wealth is a one-man conspiracy. No need for complex coordination between different people, just one extreme sociopath who can pay off or threaten anyone in his way. He is only one example, of course, but a very clear and useful one.
Do you realize that in April 2020, he made a speech (probably still available on his site) where he stated that "normalcy only returns when we have largely vaccinated the entire global population"? (That's an exact quote of his bizarre words.) He couldn't get that one (grammatically horrid) sentence out of his mouth without giggling like a child. The official position at that time was that a vaccine would probably take many years to develop and test, and might prove impossible. (That actually is the reality, although they still don't admit it.) What kind of a weirdo calls the people of the world the "global population" given that "population" is a number? Now we know what kind.
Feels like you read my mind then supplemented those thoughts with a number of brilliant angles I hadn't thought of, and then wrote it in a clear, compelling, and entertaining way. 10,000 points. Great work. 💙
I don't think what has transpired was a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The first priority of any organization is to see to the viability and permanence of the organization. Corporate structures allow for permanence beyond human lifetimes, and cover for values that humans could never exercise due to social and legal repercussions. Which is why I believe there should be execution for organizations that commit murder or genocide. This did not happen after WWII, the companies that profited from the killing and slave labor in the camps were allowed to keep operating. Nuremberg 2.0 needs to address the organizations, foundations, and corporations.
I totally get the vast majority of people inside these programs do not want to bear any responsibility for going along with a program they were hired into, may not have any actually institutional power, so I think we can hold the guns for the big targets. They have been involved for decades in coaxing and molding these programs, and that they view the peons as cattle is not an excuse for holding the view or the behavior it engenders. It says nothing about us, but much about them.
There was not merely institutional momentum, there were conspirators inside the institutions. Fauci made at least one ad for WEF; he was appointed the 'biowarfare czar' by Cheney. He has used official public monies for research for political purposes, and to silence scientists.; Collins did as well. Gates has been involved at planning levels in both public and private institutions, and has used both his private funds and his foundation, to affect policy and direction at the national and international level, and has done so for decades. "Unconscious evil" that has committed actual crimes, including abrogating treaty obligations on treatment of subjects in medical experiments, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the laws.
*lol* You know me well, James 😹
I agree on the two blades of the scissors analogy and both things can be true at once... I have argued it both ways too...
https://garysharpe.substack.com/p/are-we-no-longer-just-consumers-but
vs
https://garysharpe.substack.com/p/how-to-avoid-a-hybrid-orwellian-huxleyian
I wonder if Aman Jabbi is back on Twitter now???!!!! Thanks for this...100% all of it.
Mind virus? For there to be a thing that attacks, you need a thing that can be attacked. Certainly something’s happening, but the interpretation depends on the lens in which you view it. Is biology life itself, or what life looks like seen from your point of view?
Is what you see reality, or the image of what you think reality is? Is the image the thing itself?
On the playground called viruses are real, which is a point of view, you need something that can be attacked by them to validate that they are what they are.
Playing at answering the good and evil questions without awareness of the image as an image, and that there is no thing, but only perception, is just an attempt to be right about something.
Is something attempting to effect your perception? Of course there is. Are you responsible for that? Is there a part you play in accepting influence? Aren’t you attempting to influence the views of others? Of course you are.
Maybe what life is, isn’t a billion separate pixels, each a discrete self with a valid point of view. Maybe each pixel is ultimately responsible for the view it upholds and will be in distress or harmony according to its choice.
Bill Gates with all his wealth is a one-man conspiracy. No need for complex coordination between different people, just one extreme sociopath who can pay off or threaten anyone in his way. He is only one example, of course, but a very clear and useful one.
Do you realize that in April 2020, he made a speech (probably still available on his site) where he stated that "normalcy only returns when we have largely vaccinated the entire global population"? (That's an exact quote of his bizarre words.) He couldn't get that one (grammatically horrid) sentence out of his mouth without giggling like a child. The official position at that time was that a vaccine would probably take many years to develop and test, and might prove impossible. (That actually is the reality, although they still don't admit it.) What kind of a weirdo calls the people of the world the "global population" given that "population" is a number? Now we know what kind.