2 Comments

What a brilliant essay, James! (I plan to reread it, next time reading all the articles you embedded within the current one.)

Our age absolutely demands that we all be skeptics. But I'm afraid everything you wrote would be completely lost on a Covid Cult true believer. Those rabid, sick souls live in an impermeably closed epistemological universe which admits of no questioning of the propaganda they are continually fed, and which they eagerly ingest and embody. Their minds are rotten. I think there's no hope that they can ever be reached. Everyone in my family, except for me, is among that cohort.

Expand full comment

Oh, great; Another person posting the facts, then waiting for "Daddy-Government" to prove what a Caring Parent he is, not act to save the lives of children. Just what we need.

1) Politicians are exempt from zero laws in zero nations. 2) It IS illegal to a) mandate untested products, B) coerce or intimidate anyone OR their children to have them injected into them, C) as the articles of impeachment against Trump reminded us, take private $ while in public office (for OBVIOUS REASONS: like the ones you're all whining about right now) & D) give corporations "legal" (they aren't) protections from the harms done by their products.

So you & the hundreds of sites out there also reporting on this have FAR more than enough people on board with ending the mandates than even your governments could block or dismiss (especially as the public, once they see thousands of others on board with this would support it) & yet I can't PAY any of you hypocrites & cowards to even discuss joining in on taking those legal, non-violent measures.

But that's not what you want. You want Daddy to show He Cares. You cowards fantasize about that happening via the agency of whining because that's how Adoring Children appeal to their Daddies. Here, we're dealing with lobbyists.

How tf is WHINING going to cause LOBBYISTS to turn into your Desired Surrogate-Daddies?

& until this DOES work, you're all going to wait for "someone" always meaning someone ELSE to act.

It has to be someone else. And they have to not implicate Daddy-Government in this. Our Beliefs that 'Government' = a Caring Parent are threatened, & far more important to any of you than children's lives. & you'll all prove this by NOT attempting to use these legal, non-violent options to save them.

Expand full comment