LOVE. LOVE. LOVE. And all the past essays that form part of this Brilliant, Truthful, expression of what makes human beings HUMAN. Thank you so very much (where have you been all my life :-))
Jun 6, 2022·edited Jun 6, 2022Liked by James Edward Taylor
James, I just posted a comment on Robert Malone's 'stack in the comments thread, following the essay he published a few minutes ago titled Science vs. Scientism, recommending your 'stack to his readers. I included the link to this article, noting that it's part two of a series. I hope you acquire many more readers!
And here's the link to Malone's article to which I'm referring:
Whatever happened to that old aphorism my mom would tell me after some stupid teenage idea manifested itself: “So if all your friends jumped off a bridge, would you do it, too?”
There's something wrong here. Are you suggesting that the vaccine manufacturers are going to stop PAYING politicians to vote their way or the politicians stop accepting it depending upon YOUR POV? Because that does seem to be what you're saying.
This is simply another facet of the same self-defeating psychology. 1) Politicians are exempt from zero laws in zero nations. 2) It IS illegal to a) mandate untested products, B) coerce or intimidate anyone OR their children to have them injected into them, C) as the articles of impeachment against Trump reminded us, take private $ while in public office (for OBVIOUS REASONS: like the ones you're all whining about right now) & D) give corporations "legal" (they aren't) protections from the harms done by their products.
So you & the hundreds of sites out there also reporting on this have FAR more than enough people on board with ending the mandates than even your governments could block or dismiss (especially as the public, once they see thousands of others on board with this would support it).
& yet I can't PAY any hypocrites & cowards to even discuss joining in on taking those legal, non-violent measures.
That's not what they want. You want Daddy to show He Cares. You cowards fantasize about that happening via the agency of whining because that's how Adoring Children appeal to their Daddies. & here you are, seemingly suggesting that Daddy Will Respond To You.
If so, then YOU ALSO WANT a Personal Relationship to your surrogate-parents. You ALSO WANT Daddy to respond to you more than you want the Problems Solved.
Here, we're dealing with lobbyists.
How tf is WHINING going to cause LOBBYISTS to turn into your Desired Surrogate-Daddies?
& until this DOES work, you're all going to wait for "someone" always meaning someone ELSE to act.
It has to be someone else. And they have to not implicate Daddy-Government in this.
IF your beliefs that 'Government' = a Caring Parent are threatened, & far more important to you than children's lives, you'll all continue to prove this by NOT attempting to use these legal, non-violent options to save them.
LOVE. LOVE. LOVE. And all the past essays that form part of this Brilliant, Truthful, expression of what makes human beings HUMAN. Thank you so very much (where have you been all my life :-))
James, I just posted a comment on Robert Malone's 'stack in the comments thread, following the essay he published a few minutes ago titled Science vs. Scientism, recommending your 'stack to his readers. I included the link to this article, noting that it's part two of a series. I hope you acquire many more readers!
And here's the link to Malone's article to which I'm referring:
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/science-versus-scientism-part-1/comments?s=r
Love love love this. Really resonated with me. A feeling of comfort that I am not alone. We are not alone. So much truth here.
Thanks for the invaluable work you do, James! (Please note emphasis on "invaluable.")
Wow. That was brilliant. Thank you.
Whatever happened to that old aphorism my mom would tell me after some stupid teenage idea manifested itself: “So if all your friends jumped off a bridge, would you do it, too?”
There's something wrong here. Are you suggesting that the vaccine manufacturers are going to stop PAYING politicians to vote their way or the politicians stop accepting it depending upon YOUR POV? Because that does seem to be what you're saying.
This is simply another facet of the same self-defeating psychology. 1) Politicians are exempt from zero laws in zero nations. 2) It IS illegal to a) mandate untested products, B) coerce or intimidate anyone OR their children to have them injected into them, C) as the articles of impeachment against Trump reminded us, take private $ while in public office (for OBVIOUS REASONS: like the ones you're all whining about right now) & D) give corporations "legal" (they aren't) protections from the harms done by their products.
So you & the hundreds of sites out there also reporting on this have FAR more than enough people on board with ending the mandates than even your governments could block or dismiss (especially as the public, once they see thousands of others on board with this would support it).
& yet I can't PAY any hypocrites & cowards to even discuss joining in on taking those legal, non-violent measures.
That's not what they want. You want Daddy to show He Cares. You cowards fantasize about that happening via the agency of whining because that's how Adoring Children appeal to their Daddies. & here you are, seemingly suggesting that Daddy Will Respond To You.
If so, then YOU ALSO WANT a Personal Relationship to your surrogate-parents. You ALSO WANT Daddy to respond to you more than you want the Problems Solved.
Here, we're dealing with lobbyists.
How tf is WHINING going to cause LOBBYISTS to turn into your Desired Surrogate-Daddies?
& until this DOES work, you're all going to wait for "someone" always meaning someone ELSE to act.
It has to be someone else. And they have to not implicate Daddy-Government in this.
IF your beliefs that 'Government' = a Caring Parent are threatened, & far more important to you than children's lives, you'll all continue to prove this by NOT attempting to use these legal, non-violent options to save them.