Neil, you say you do not care about individual scientists, only in “scientific consensus”. Would you have sided with the scientific consensus of the time against Copernicus? Galileo? Newton? Darwin? Einstein? Would you have sided with geocentrism, a flat earth, space filled with ether, or medical leeching, since, in their time, those were the prevailing consensus views? Would you have opposed evolution by natural selection, or general relativity, since those represented challenges to the consensus views of their time?
After reading the comments to Del’s interview with NDT, I couldn’t bring myself to watch the interview. This confirms my belief that my brothers will NEVER awaken from their slumber. They are both amateur astronomers. It’s confounding. They would never discuss the info my sister and I tried to send them. And if they ever did, they would just parrot what this pathetic so called scientist said.
Very interesting. My definition of intelligence remains having the ability to consider and to accept that everything one has been taught to belief and everything one does believe may in fact be wrong.
Science as you point out is a study and scientists are students who's role is to critique the design and execution of studies and to prove each other wrong, until they can't.
We certainly do not live in an age where dissent is encouraged, the opposite. I was banned from Twitter for saying that viruses don't exist. Whatever one's views- there is no scientific evidence that viruses exist if you critique the design and execution of studies saying that there are- one should be allowed to say so on social media https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing - which we now know also censured verifiable information on mRNA jab injuries.
Science died in April 1984 (if not many years before that) when HIV was announced as the probable cause of AIDS by a press secretary at a press conference- NO debate was allowed. The alleged scientific consensus on HIV is entirely WRONG https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/the-importance-of-intellectual-freedom
Very good questions!!! In my latest post, I was writing about "epistemic injustice" which now pervades science, and especially medicine... this is another clear example of this in action!
After reading the comments to Del’s interview with NDT, I couldn’t bring myself to watch the interview. This confirms my belief that my brothers will NEVER awaken from their slumber. They are both amateur astronomers. It’s confounding. They would never discuss the info my sister and I tried to send them. And if they ever did, they would just parrot what this pathetic so called scientist said.
The long slow dissolution of science into intellectualized, irrational pudding - along with our brains. Good essay.
Most excellent James!
Clear and concise and echoes
my thoughts. Thank you for your
time and effort sir.
Very interesting. My definition of intelligence remains having the ability to consider and to accept that everything one has been taught to belief and everything one does believe may in fact be wrong.
Science as you point out is a study and scientists are students who's role is to critique the design and execution of studies and to prove each other wrong, until they can't.
We certainly do not live in an age where dissent is encouraged, the opposite. I was banned from Twitter for saying that viruses don't exist. Whatever one's views- there is no scientific evidence that viruses exist if you critique the design and execution of studies saying that there are- one should be allowed to say so on social media https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing - which we now know also censured verifiable information on mRNA jab injuries.
Science died in April 1984 (if not many years before that) when HIV was announced as the probable cause of AIDS by a press secretary at a press conference- NO debate was allowed. The alleged scientific consensus on HIV is entirely WRONG https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/the-importance-of-intellectual-freedom
No one is doing science - what they are doing is using scientific words and dazzling lights to sell us medicines and treatments we don't need https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/how-power-couple-pharma-regulation
Jo
Very good questions!!! In my latest post, I was writing about "epistemic injustice" which now pervades science, and especially medicine... this is another clear example of this in action!