The sooner people become aware of the agents and the agenda behind wikipedia the better. I only use if for non critical info like crossword puzzle questions. Terrain Theory makes logical sense. It is analogous to how the best way to solve a fly problem is not just spraying toxic fly poisons in every direction daily as in cleaning up the filth in the area so flies are not attracted and breed. Oh and I have to admit that I am both a tooth fairy and Santa Claus denier, sorry.
Humans are so easily bamboozled. No proof of anything and they stand right up and back their belief without any evidence what soever, like the germ theory, and corrupt lies by preachers, the trinity, the immortality of the soul, Christmas, Easter, the so-called Christian cross and many more. And when there is proof they ignore it and stick to their cognitive dissonance. Like the founding fathers were upright moral heroes and this country certainly wasn't based on wars, genocide and lies. People will bow down and serve an idol (the Flag) when their own religion tells them idolatry is forbidden. They will murder their fellow brothers and sisters around the world when their criminal leaders tell them to. With all of this, why in the world would we think they wouldn't reject something as sane as the terrain theory.?
Many thanks for your insightful post as well as links, especially the one leading to Dr. Sam Bailey !!!
Germ Theory : Rely on "the science" and big-pharma !!! completely de-franchising the individual's self-reliance and -accountability; resulting in unseen and highly welcomed windfall-profits for them.
Terrain Theory : Rely on your own guts and use your brain, don't be silly enough by preparing your own body to be a playground for microbal attack !!! re-installing self-reliance with a paradigm-shift in life-style and consumption, thus totally crushing big-pharma and agri ...
Guess who's getting nervous and trying to smear ??? ...🤔🤔🤔
The theory of BS...virology has that covered 100%. No search engine or A/i bum on earth is going to be HONEST. It's all programmed toward a specific agenda.
This is fine, except that Brave search also lists the same Wikipedia article at the top, and the rest of the search results are nearly the same as in Google. Furthermore, Google's AI summary is strikingly similar to Brave AI, and it is also reasonable and balanced and not sneering. The only difference is that at the very end, Google added a "note" that Terrain theory, by itself, doesn't explain everything about disease.
In other words, I found the difference is not between Brave and Google, but between AI and search (in certain search engines.) In terms of search results, Mojeek does much better than either Google or Brave. Mojeek's top result was an article with a neutral, balanced discussion of the differences between terrain and germ theories.
Personally, even though AI did better than the top result for this particular search, I still prefer to use search, and look through multiple results and figure it out for myself. Because AI is still wrong about most things, most of the time. For example, never ask AI a question about using software, or a tax question, because they almost always get the answer wrong.
The sooner people become aware of the agents and the agenda behind wikipedia the better. I only use if for non critical info like crossword puzzle questions. Terrain Theory makes logical sense. It is analogous to how the best way to solve a fly problem is not just spraying toxic fly poisons in every direction daily as in cleaning up the filth in the area so flies are not attracted and breed. Oh and I have to admit that I am both a tooth fairy and Santa Claus denier, sorry.
Humans are so easily bamboozled. No proof of anything and they stand right up and back their belief without any evidence what soever, like the germ theory, and corrupt lies by preachers, the trinity, the immortality of the soul, Christmas, Easter, the so-called Christian cross and many more. And when there is proof they ignore it and stick to their cognitive dissonance. Like the founding fathers were upright moral heroes and this country certainly wasn't based on wars, genocide and lies. People will bow down and serve an idol (the Flag) when their own religion tells them idolatry is forbidden. They will murder their fellow brothers and sisters around the world when their criminal leaders tell them to. With all of this, why in the world would we think they wouldn't reject something as sane as the terrain theory.?
Yep.
It's good that you've done a very intelligent post on this. Welcome to 2020. ;)
I've known about all this for five years, so I'm going to skip going into any details or whatever, because you seem to have it together. Cheers.
In that case, you should be glad when dummies like me catch up to your genius.😉
Thanks for the link to my piece, friend. 👊🏼
Many thanks for your insightful post as well as links, especially the one leading to Dr. Sam Bailey !!!
Germ Theory : Rely on "the science" and big-pharma !!! completely de-franchising the individual's self-reliance and -accountability; resulting in unseen and highly welcomed windfall-profits for them.
Terrain Theory : Rely on your own guts and use your brain, don't be silly enough by preparing your own body to be a playground for microbal attack !!! re-installing self-reliance with a paradigm-shift in life-style and consumption, thus totally crushing big-pharma and agri ...
Guess who's getting nervous and trying to smear ??? ...🤔🤔🤔
This reply is NOT brought to you by Pfizer !!!
Don't forget the granddad of denialism - Hollowcaust Denialism!
I had the same response to it that most people do to 'virus denialism'.
Turns out Holocaust skepticism has some teeth, too. (Book reccy: Debating the Holocaust.)
At this point, any time I read the words XXX Denialism, I assume that XXX is false and the denialists have the better arguments.
Here's a quick once-over of Holocaust Revision concepts. They are valid questions:
https://misterkel.substack.com/p/holocaust-denialism
The theory of BS...virology has that covered 100%. No search engine or A/i bum on earth is going to be HONEST. It's all programmed toward a specific agenda.
This is fine, except that Brave search also lists the same Wikipedia article at the top, and the rest of the search results are nearly the same as in Google. Furthermore, Google's AI summary is strikingly similar to Brave AI, and it is also reasonable and balanced and not sneering. The only difference is that at the very end, Google added a "note" that Terrain theory, by itself, doesn't explain everything about disease.
In other words, I found the difference is not between Brave and Google, but between AI and search (in certain search engines.) In terms of search results, Mojeek does much better than either Google or Brave. Mojeek's top result was an article with a neutral, balanced discussion of the differences between terrain and germ theories.
Personally, even though AI did better than the top result for this particular search, I still prefer to use search, and look through multiple results and figure it out for myself. Because AI is still wrong about most things, most of the time. For example, never ask AI a question about using software, or a tax question, because they almost always get the answer wrong.